The Supreme Court Ducked Another Big Abortion Case. Clarence Thomas Is Livid.
For nearly three years, it has seemed inevitable that the Supreme Court would strike down the “buffer zones” that restrict protests near the entrances of reproductive health clinics. A majority of the court has already castigated these laws—and past precedent upholding them—as a subversion of anti-abortion protesters’ First Amendment rights.
The court decided not to take the case brought against the government by an Air National Guard member who was paralyzed ...
The Root on MSN1d
Oh Lord, Republicans are Pushing for a Clarence Thomas Statue, But Here’s Why This Should Never HappenAs Republicans are enjoying their majority in both the House and Senate, they are also pushing forth their own (questionable) ...
In 5-3 decision, the justices set aside Richard Glossip's conviction, saying it may have been based on false testimony.
The George H.W. Bush appointee said service members should be afforded the same chance at relief for government negligence as ...
The US Supreme Court has once again refused to overturn an oft-criticized rule that bars soldiers from suing the federal ...
The Supreme Court refused Monday to take up a First Amendment case to revisit a previous ruling enshrining abortion clinic ...
The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday threw out the conviction and death penalty for Richard Glossip, an Oklahoma man who has ...
The Supreme Court on Thursday appointed a former clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas to argue in a case involving the application of the federal laws governing post-conviction relief for federal ...
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results
Feedback